https://exhibits.library.utoronto.ca/files/original/c64644a24f33ec7133b310310d5c5d9b.pdf 32c70e22df544050c13bf4b7e0a8d834 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Canadian Federalism Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data text file/pdf Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource R v Comeau, 2016 NBPC 3 (CanLII), <<a href="http://canlii.ca/t/gpr3f" target="_blank">http://canlii.ca/t/gpr3f</a>>, retrieved on 2017-03-10 Subject The topic of the resource Canada Interprovincial trade Constitutional law federalism Description An account of the resource This document is a decision of LeBlanc J (NBPC) in R. v. Comeau (R v Comeau, 2016 NBPC 3). Comeau was charged under the New Brunswick Liquor Control Act for having in his possession liquor that he purchased outside the Province of New Brunswick. Mr. Comeau had purchased 354 bottles or cans of beer and three bottles of liquor in Quebec and had brought these items into New Brunswick. At trial, he challenged the constitutional validity of the provincial legislation in question pursuant to s. 121 of the Canadian Constitution. Le Blanc J found in favour of Mr. Comeau, holding that the Liquor Control Act did violate the Canadian Constitution. In his decision, Le Blanc J wrote: <blockquote>“I find that the speeches and orations from the Fathers of Confederation prior to the enactment of the British North America Act, 1867, conclusively point to their desire to implement free trade as opposed to the elimination of customs duties as between the provinces,”</blockquote> The Attorney General of New Brunswick appealed this decision to the New Brunswick Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal rejected the appeal in October, 2016. See: R v Comeau, 2016 CanLII 73665 (NB CA), <<a href="http://canlii.ca/t/gvd55" target="_blank">http://canlii.ca/t/gvd55</a>>, retrieved on 2017-03-10. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource New Brunswick Provincial Court per LeBlanc J. Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived R v Comeau, 2016 NBPC 3 (CanLII), <<a href="http://canlii.ca/t/gpr3f" target="_blank">http://canlii.ca/t/gpr3f</a>>, retrieved on 2017-03-10 Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Canadian Legal Information Institute, online: www.canlii.org. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource April 29, 2016 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource (c) New Brunswick Provincial Court (c) Canadian Legal Information Institute, online: www.canlii.org. Relation A related resource R v Comeau, 2016 CanLII 73665 (NB CA), <<a href="http://canlii.ca/t/gvd55" target="_blank">http://canlii.ca/t/gvd55</a>>, retrieved on 2017-03-10 Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource text file/pdf Language A language of the resource English Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context New Brunswick Provincial Court Docket: 05672010 canada constitutional law federalism interprovincial trade liquor New Brunswick R. v. Comeau